ĒMA Quarterly Impact Report

Every Mother's Advocate  ·  Quarterly impact snapshot

Loading dashboard…
Updating…

How ĒMA Is Doing

The three core measures of impact this period: family preservation, family stability, and learning progress.

Core KPIs  ·  Q1 2026
What counts
Moms with at least one child prevented from CPS Involvement or Foster Care Placement, divided by all moms whose children had an active welfare involvement goal and a Family Wellbeing Assessment on file during the period.
Excluded
Moms whose children entered the program already permanently removed or in kinship placement. Children in Temporary or Permanent Removal status at period end. Prevented from Permanent Removal cases are also excluded from the numerator until the validation pathway is in place.
Known limitation
Deliberate undercount in service of data integrity. Teams familiar with the broader Prevention definition may expect a higher number; the gap is the Permanent Removal Prevention cases held back.
48%
↓ 37pt below target
target 85%
Family Preservation Rate
28 of 58 eligible children preserved  ·  20 children excluded
What counts
Moms whose composite Family Stability Score went up between her starting and most recent Family Wellbeing Assessment. The composite is the sum of 11 life-area domain scores (housing, financial, social support, education, child care, transportation, wellness, etc.).
Excluded
Moms with only one Family Wellbeing Assessment on file (no before/after comparison possible). Legacy assessments from the prior system are also excluded.
Interpret with care
Family Wellbeing Assessment capture is still ramping up across affiliates. Sample sizes are small and the rate can shift noticeably as more moms reach a second assessment. The direction is meaningful; the exact percentage may not yet be stable.
71%
↑ 1pt above target
target 70%
Family Stability Score Improvement
— of — moms show composite FSS improvement  ·  — moms excluded
Improved —   Stable —   Declined —
What counts
Any score increase between a mom's start-of-track and end-of-track learning assessment. Each track counts separately, so a mom completing two tracks counts twice. NPP scores come from the AAPI assessment (5 constructs); EP and RR scores from their post-track assessments.
Excluded
Tracks missing a pre or post assessment. Legacy assessments from the prior system are excluded. EP and RR post-assessments are not yet captured at scale — the rate reflects NPP completions this period.
Interpret with care
Sample sizes vary by curriculum — see the per-curriculum breakdown on the Track Completions tab for confidence flags. The direction is meaningful; the exact percentage may shift as more tracks complete.
72%
↑ 2pt above target
target 70%
Learning Progress
13 of 18 eligible completions improved  ·  NPP-driven this period
Program Status  ·  Q1 2026
What counts
Every mom active at any point during the period, including moms who completed or exited within the period. In a Track requires a pairing record at any point during the period; if no pairing, she falls into Membership Community.
Excluded
No mom appears in both buckets. End-of-period counts are lower than total served, since some moms exited or completed during the period.
Mothers
94 active during Q1 2026
Active During Q1 2026 each mother counted once
In a Track
65%
Membership Community
35%
Q1 Activity records created or last updated Jan 1 to Mar 31
31Referrals Received
22Engaged in Program
18Track Completions
What counts
Sum of child profiles linked to moms active during the period; only children the mom has legal authority over count. Child Welfare Prevention shows the same number as the KPI 1 numerator above, multiplied by $38,850 per child for the Estimated Impact Value.
Excluded
Children whose mom has no current FWA on file (excluded from Child Welfare Prevention). Permanent Removal Prevention cases (held back until the validation pathway is in place).
Known limitation
Where a mom has no child count on file, the average across active moms is used as a proxy. The Estimated Impact Value uses $38,850 per child (per ĒMA white paper) and is an estimated, not confirmed, financial figure.
Children
142 active during Q1 2026
0
Prevented from CPS Involvement
Year to date children with an open investigation that didn't escalate
0
Prevented from Foster Care Placement
Year to date children prevented from foster care removal
~$0
Year to Date Impact
0 children × $38,850 · year to date avoided foster care cost
What counts
Each advocate appears in exactly one bucket, in priority order: Group Facilitator then Paired 1:1 then Waiting to be Paired then Taking a Break. The mom's pairing record is the source of truth and takes precedence over the advocate's own status.
Excluded
Activity events are independent counts, not a funnel. An advocate who trained and was approved during the period appears in both. Counts are derived from the current User record state, not event history; an advocate cycling through multiple states during the period reflects only her most recent state.
Known limitation
Some advocates are set to Active status with a "Taking a Break" sub-status as a coordinator workaround. The pairing-first rule handles this correctly. Group facilitator count and sub-status values need confirmation against live data before final publication.
Advocates
57 active during Q1 2026
Active During Q1 each advocate counted once · priority order
Paired 1:1
82%
Group facilitators
9%
Waiting to be paired
7%
Taking a break
2%
Q1 Activity records created or last updated Jan 1 to Mar 31
14Interest Form Received
9Trained
7Approved
7Became Active
3Became Inactive

How Moms Reach ĒMA

Referral volume by source, conversion to engagement, and outcomes for the moms who came in this period.

Referral Summary  ·  Q1 2026
What counts
Each mother counted once by her referral source. One row per Mom record — even if a coordinator entered referral details across multiple sessions, she contributes a single referral here.
Excluded
Duplicate Mom records (same person re-entered) are excluded so a mother is never double-counted across this tab. Exclusion is applied uniformly to every card and table on this page so the totals reconcile.
38
Total Referrals
All sources · duplicates excluded
What counts
Engaged divided by resolved referrals (Engaged plus Did Not Engage). Resolved means the referral has reached a final outcome.
Excluded
Still Pending referrals are shown separately and not counted in the rate. Duplicate referrals are also excluded.
91%
Conversion Rate
29 engaged of 32 resolved
What counts
Each referral counted once by its current outcome status.
Excluded
Duplicate Mom records are excluded — applied uniformly across every card on this tab.

Referral outcomes

38 referrals total
29 Engaged in Program
6 Still Pending
3 Did Not Engage
Referrals by Source
What counts
Each referral counted once by its source category.
Excluded
Sources with fewer than 5 referrals are grouped under Other Sources to protect mother privacy.

Where referrals come from

0 referrals across 0 source categories
What counts
Each row shows where referrals from this source ended up: Engaged, Did Not Engage, or Still Pending. Conversion Rate = Engaged divided by resolved (Engaged + Did Not Engage). Share = this source's % of all referrals.
Excluded
Still Pending referrals are shown but excluded from the conversion rate. Sources with fewer than 5 referrals during the period are rolled into Other Sources with detailed counts hidden, to protect mothers who could be identified within small groups.
Known limitation
Referral source is a free-text field. Live data may include misspellings or variations of the same agency name. Affiliate teams clean these up over time.
Referral Source Referrals Received Engaged in Program Conversion Rate Still Pending % of All Referrals
DCF / Child Protective Services 121091%
Self-Referral / Walk-In 8583%
Community Partner / Nonprofit 76100%
Hospital / Healthcare Provider 5480%
Other Sources 2 sources with fewer than 5 referrals Show 64100%
All Sources 38 29 91%

How Tracks Finish

Completion outcomes, curriculum mix, and learning progress for tracks closed during the period.

Track Completions  ·  Q1 2026
18
Tracks Completed
Across all track types and delivery formats
What counts
Any track with a closed status recorded during the period, regardless of when the track started.
Excluded
Did Not Initiate Sessions has been removed from this tab entirely. A mom can't fail to complete a track she never started — those cases are now reported only on the Referral Sources tab as part of Referral Outcomes. Same-day close/reopen duplicates are also excluded (data-entry pattern used to change track type, not a real exit).
Known limitation
EP and RR launched recently, so moms who enrolled late had less time to finish. Lower completion rates for those tracks are expected at this stage, not a concern.
58%
Completion Rate
18 completed of 31 tracks closed in Q2
What counts
Full Track = all required curriculum sessions, at least one support session on file, and a post-assessment on file. Without Support Sessions = curriculum complete but no support sessions recorded. Without Post Assessment = sessions complete but no post-assessment on file.
Known limitation
Tracks closed Without Post Assessment are excluded from the Learning Progress KPI denominator since change cannot be measured.

How Tracks Completed

18 tracks completed during the period
Full Track
11
Full Track
Curriculum, support sessions, post-assessment all on file
61%
Without Support Sessions
4
Without Support Sessions
Curriculum complete, no support sessions recorded
22%
Without Post Assessment
3
Without Post Assessment
Sessions complete, no post-assessment on file
17%
What counts
Track Requirements Unmet = closed without meeting curriculum or participation requirements. Client Choice = mom elected to exit. Relocated = moved outside the service area. Other = reason not in standard categories.
Excluded
Did Not Initiate Sessions has been removed from this tab entirely. A mom can't fail to complete a track she never started — those cases are now reported only on the Referral Sources tab as part of Referral Outcomes.

Why Tracks Ended Early

13 tracks ended without completion
Track Requirements Unmet
6
Track Requirements Unmet
Closed without meeting curriculum or participation requirements
46%
Client Choice
4
Client Choice
Mom elected to exit the track
31%
Relocated
2
Relocated
Moved outside the service area
15%
Other
1
Other
Reason not in standard categories
8%
What counts
Each completed track counted by its delivery format.

Delivery Format

18 completed tracks
1:1 Advocacy
72%
Group Setting
28%
What counts
Each completed track counted by the curriculum language.

Language Split

18 completed tracks
English
60%
Spanish
40%
By Track  ·  Q1 2026 Tracks closed during the period  ·  per-curriculum view
What counts
Each closed track counted by its curriculum. Hover a slice for completion detail.

Tracks closed by curriculum

143 tracks closed during the period
NPP Nurturing Parenting
48%
EP Empowered Parenting
34%
RR Roadmap to Resilience
19%
What counts
Moms whose end-of-track assessment score was higher than their start-of-track score, divided by all moms with both assessments on file. Same method as KPI 3. Each track counted separately.
Excluded
Tracks missing a start or end assessment, and entries where the end date is earlier than the start date.
Known limitation
Sample size flags appear next to each track. Below 20 valid pairs = interpret with caution. Below 10 = not yet interpretable. Stable rates need 30 or more pairs.

Per-curriculum rates

Curriculum Completion rate Learning progress
NPP Nurturing Parenting 16% FEW MOMSFew moms finished this track with both assessments on file. With this few, one result either way moves the rate a lot, so read it as a direction, not a firm number. 80% FEW MOMSFew moms finished this track with both assessments on file. With this few, one result either way moves the rate a lot, so read it as a direction, not a firm number.
EP Empowered Parenting 10% FEW MOMSFew moms finished this track with both assessments on file. With this few, one result either way moves the rate a lot, so read it as a direction, not a firm number. 60% FEW MOMSFew moms finished this track with both assessments on file. With this few, one result either way moves the rate a lot, so read it as a direction, not a firm number.
RR Roadmap to Resilience 7% FEW MOMSFew moms finished this track with both assessments on file. With this few, one result either way moves the rate a lot, so read it as a direction, not a firm number. 67% FEW MOMSFew moms finished this track with both assessments on file. With this few, one result either way moves the rate a lot, so read it as a direction, not a firm number.

Who ĒMA Serves

Demographic profile of moms in active service during the period. Coverage varies by field; some are captured for nearly everyone, others only at Trellis intake.

What counts
Moms who selected a race on her intake or profile.
Known limitation
Race is single-select. Moms who identify with multiple races appear in only one category.

Race

87 moms with race recorded
Black or African American
52%
Hispanic or Latino
24%
White
14%
Asian
4%
American Indian
3%
Middle Eastern or N African
1%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
1%
Alaskan Native
1%
What counts
Age calculated from date of birth as of period end.
Known limitation
Moms with no date of birth recorded are not shown.

Age

87 moms with date of birth recorded
0 10 20 30 40 5% Under 18 21% 18 to 24 40% 25 to 34 25% 35 to 44 9% 45 and up
What counts
Languages each mom speaks, recorded on her intake or profile.
Known limitation
Moms who speak more than one language are counted once per language. Bars may sum to more than 100%.

Top 5 languages spoken

92 moms with languages recorded
English
87%
Spanish
38%
Haitian Creole
6%
Portuguese
3%
French
2%
Only the top 5 are shown; less common languages are not listed.
What counts
Whether mom was pregnant when added to the system.

Pregnancy status at intake

147 moms with pregnancy status recorded
Not pregnant at intake
88%
Pregnant at intake
12%
What counts
Children who live with mom. Includes children temporarily placed out of home by CPS.
Known limitation
Bucket "4 or more" combines all moms with four or more children at home.

Children in the home

4.2
Average age of children
Across 284 children of served moms
2.1
Average children per mom
Across 150 served moms
150 moms with household details recorded
0 10 20 30 40 50 3% 0 32% 1 31% 2 20% 3 14% 4 or more
What counts
Caregiver role mom selected on her intake or profile.

Caregiver type

99 moms with caregiver type recorded
Biological mom
88%
Foster mom
5%
Adoptive mom
4%
Relative guardian
3%
What counts
Mom's relationship status when added to the system.

Marital status

89 moms with marital status recorded
Single
79%
Separated or divorced
12%
Married
8%
Widowed
1%

Where ĒMA Serves

Geographic profile of moms in active service during the period. The map shifts between county and state detail depending on the spread of served regions.

What counts
Each mom counted once by her county of residence. Color depth shows comparative volume.
View mode
When moms are concentrated in one or two states, counties are shown. When more states are involved, the view shifts to state-level shading.

Where moms live

182 moms with location on file
Loading map...
Fewer moms
More moms
What counts
County is derived from the mother's ZIP code via the Census ZCTA-to-County crosswalk. The free-text county field on the Mom record is no longer used — ZIP-derived county is the source of truth and reconciles cleanly with the Top ZIPs panel (every mom in a given ZIP appears in the same county).
Known limitation
Moms whose ZIP is missing or unrecognized fall into "Unknown" rather than being assigned a guess. Recent address moves are reflected — county follows the ZIP currently on file.

Counties served

0 moms with ZIP-derived county
What counts
Mom counts grouped by ZIP code from her address.
Excluded
ZIPs not in the top 5 are combined into Other ZIPs. ZIPs with fewer than 5 moms are also combined into this row to protect mother privacy.

Top ZIP codes

0 moms with ZIP recorded
#ZIPAreaMoms
ĒMA - Every Mother's Advocate
Our approach to data integrity →
Export Referral Data
This export contains aggregated referral source data for the selected affiliate scope. It is subject to ĒMA data use policies.
Acknowledgment of Responsibility

This export contains program-level data about referrals to ĒMA. You are authorized to access it for program oversight purposes only.

You must not share this file with unauthorized parties, use it for purposes outside of ĒMA program activities, or store it on unsecured personal devices.

Any suspected breach must be reported immediately to your supervisor and ĒMA leadership.